@article{16348,
  author = {Russell Elizabeth and Watkins R. and Elliott E. and Mutch R. and Jones H. and Miers Sue and McKenzie A. and Fitzpatrick James and O'Leary C. and Halliday J. and Burns L. and Carter Maureen and Latimer Jane and Peadon E. and Payne J. and Wilkins A. and Hayes L. and Bower C. and D'Antoine Heather},
  title = {Health professionals inverted question mark perceptions about the adoption of existing guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia},
  abstract = {<p>
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of five guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), there is no national endorsement for their use in diagnosis in Australia. In this study we aimed to describe health professionals inverted question mark perceptions about the adoption of existing guidelines for the diagnosis of FASD in Australia and identify implications for the development of national guidelines. METHODS: We surveyed 130 Australian and 9 international health professionals with expertise or involvement in the screening or diagnosis of FASD. An online questionnaire was used to evaluate participants inverted question mark familiarity with and use of five existing diagnostic guidelines for FASD, and to assess their perceptions about the adoption of these guidelines in Australia. RESULTS: Of the 139 participants surveyed, 84 Australian and 8 international health professionals (66.2%) responded to the questions on existing diagnostic guidelines. Participants most frequently reported using the University of Washington 4-Digit Diagnostic Code (27.2%) and the Canadian guidelines (18.5%) for diagnosis. These two guidelines were also most frequently recommended for adoption in Australia: 32.5% of the 40 participants who were familiar with the University of Washington 4-Digit Diagnostic Code recommended adoption of this guideline in Australia, and 30.8% of the 26 participants who were familiar with the Canadian guidelines recommended adoption of this guideline in Australia. However, for the majority of guidelines examined, most participants were unsure whether they should be adopted in Australia. The adoption of existing guidelines in Australia was perceived to be limited by: their lack of evidence base, including the appropriateness of established reference standards for the Australian population; their complexity; the need for training and support to use the guidelines; and the lack of an interdisciplinary and interagency model to support service delivery in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Participants indicated some support for the adoption of the University of Washington or Canadian guidelines for FASD diagnosis; however, concerns were raised about the adoption of these diagnostic guidelines in their current form. Australian diagnostic guidelines will require evaluation to establish their validity in the Australian context, and a comprehensive implementation model is needed to facilitate improved diagnostic capacity in Australia.
</p>
},
  year = {2012},
  journal = {BMC Pediatrics},
  volume = {12},
  edition = {2012/06/16},
  number = {1},
  pages = {69},
  month = {-35726387164},
  isbn = {1471-2431 (Electronic)1471-2431 (Linking)},
  note = {Watkins, Rochelle EElliott, Elizabeth JMutch, Raewyn CLatimer, JaneWilkins, AmandaPayne, Janet MJones, Heather MMiers, SuePeadon, ElizabethMcKenzie, AnneD'Antoine, Heather ARussell, ElizabethFitzpatrick, JamesO'Leary, Colleen MHalliday, JaneHayes, LorianBurns, LucindaCarter, MaureenBower, CarolBMC Pediatr. 2012 Jun 14;12(1):69.},
  language = {Eng},
}