@article{22984,
  author = {Gallagher M. and Campbell Denise and Craig Jonathan and Saweirs Walaa and Mudge David and Lim Wai and Ranganathan Dwaraka},
  title = {Infection Prophylaxis in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Results from an Australia/New Zealand Survey.},
  abstract = {<p>
♦ BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines aim to reduce the rates of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections, a common complication of PD in end-stage kidney disease patients. We describe the clinical practices used by Australian and New Zealand nephrologists to prevent PD-related infections in PD patients. ♦ METHODS: A survey of PD practices in relation to the use of antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis in PD patients was conducted of practicing nephrologists identified via the Australia and New Zealand Society of Nephrology (ANZSN) membership in 2013. ♦ RESULTS: Of 333 nephrologists approached, 133 (39.9%) participated. Overall, 127 (95.5%) nephrologists prescribed antibiotics at the time of Tenckhoff catheter insertion, 85 (63.9%) routinely screened for nasal S. aureus carriage, with 76 (88.4%) reporting they treated S. aureus carriers with mupirocin ointment. Following Tenckhoff catheter insertion, 79 (59.4%) prescribed mupirocin ointment at the exit site or intranasally, and 93 (69.9%) nephrologists routinely prescribed a course of oral antifungal agent whenever their PD patients were given a course of antibiotics. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of nephrologists prescribe antibiotics at the time of Tenckhoff catheter insertion, less than 70% routinely prescribe mupirocin ointment and/or prophylactic antifungal therapy. This variation in practice in Australia and New Zealand may contribute to the disparity in PD-related infection rates that is seen between units.
</p>
},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Perit Dial Int},
  volume = {37},
  pages = {191-197},
  issn = {1718-4304},
  doi = {10.3747/pdi.2016.00037},
  language = {eng},
}