02736nas a2200277 4500000000100000008004100001100002000042700001800062700001900080700001700099700002600116700002000142700002400162700001900186700001800205700001200223700001900235700001700254700001800271700001700289700002200306700001600328245012000344520198000464022001402444 2018 d1 aHeerspink Hiddo1 ade Zeeuw Dick1 aPerkovic Vlado1 aBrennan John1 aCorrea-Rotter Ricardo1 aMakino Hirofumi1 aParving Hans-Henrik1 aAndress Dennis1 aBakris George1 aHou Fan1 aKitzman Dalane1 aKohan Donald1 aMcMurray John1 aTobe Sheldon1 aWigderson Melissa1 aYi Tingting00aBaseline characteristics and enrichment results of the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR) trial.3 a
INTRODUCTION: The SONAR trial uses an enrichment design based on the individual response to the selective endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan on efficacy (the degree of the individual response in urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, UACR), and safety/tolerability (signs of sodium retention and acute increases in serum creatinine) to assess the effects of this agent on major renal outcomes. The patient population and enrichment results are described here.
METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes with estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) between 25 and 75 ml/min/1.73mand UACR between 300 and 5000 mg/g were enrolled. After a run-in period, eligible patients received 0.75 atrasentan for 6 weeks. A total of 2648 responder patients in whom UACR decreased ≥30% compared to baseline were enrolled as well as 1020 non-responders with less than 30% UACR decrease. Patients who experienced more than 3 kg weight gain and in whom brain natriuretic peptide exceeded ≥300 pg/mL, or who experienced an increase in serum creatinine >20% and 0.5 mg/dL were not randomized.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between atrasentan responders and non-responders. At entry into the study, median UACR was 802 mg/g in responders and 920 mg/g in non-responders. After 6 weeks treatment with atrasentan, UACR change in responders was -48.8% (95%CI -49.8% to -47.9%) and in non-responders was -1.2% (95%CI -6.4% to 3.9%). Changes in other renal risk markers were similar between responders and non-responders apart from a marginally greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and eGFR in responders.
CONCLUSION: The enrichment period has successfully identified a population with a profound UACR reduction without clinical signs of sodium retention in whom a large atrasentan effect on clinically important renal outcomes is possible. The SONAR trial aims to establish whether atrasentan confers renal protection.
a1463-1326