Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) are used as surrogate measures of cough and huff strength. Some body positions (particularly head-down tilt) significantly affect these measures in people with normal respiratory function and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This may have implications for people with cystic fibrosis (CF), who use coughing and huffing and may use gravity-assisted drainage positions for airway clearance. Previous research concluded that body position does not affect MEP in people with CF, although head-down tilt was not examined and PEFR was not measured. This study investigated the effect of body position on MEP and PEFR in 20 adults with stable CF. Repeated measures of MEP and PEFR were performed across seven positions (standing, chair-sitting, sitting in bed with backrest vertical, sitting in bed with backrest at 45 degrees , supine, side-lying, and side-lying with head-down tilt 20 degrees ) in random order. During testing, reflux sensation and oxygenation were monitored. MEP was significantly reduced in side-lying and in the head-down tilt position. PEFRs were significantly reduced in the three-quarters sitting, supine, side-lying, and head-down positions. Oxygenation and reflux scores were worst in the head-down position. Despite statistical significance, the differences observed between positions in this stable population were of small magnitude. The effect of body position on MEP and PEFR may be more relevant during airway clearance treatments of the acutely unwell person with CF.
BT - Pediatric Pulmonology C1 - 1.965 C2 - 2.267 CN - N J2 - Pediatr Pulmonol LA - eng LB - MSjournal M1 - 5 N1 - HERDC category C1 N2 -Maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) are used as surrogate measures of cough and huff strength. Some body positions (particularly head-down tilt) significantly affect these measures in people with normal respiratory function and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This may have implications for people with cystic fibrosis (CF), who use coughing and huffing and may use gravity-assisted drainage positions for airway clearance. Previous research concluded that body position does not affect MEP in people with CF, although head-down tilt was not examined and PEFR was not measured. This study investigated the effect of body position on MEP and PEFR in 20 adults with stable CF. Repeated measures of MEP and PEFR were performed across seven positions (standing, chair-sitting, sitting in bed with backrest vertical, sitting in bed with backrest at 45 degrees , supine, side-lying, and side-lying with head-down tilt 20 degrees ) in random order. During testing, reflux sensation and oxygenation were monitored. MEP was significantly reduced in side-lying and in the head-down tilt position. PEFRs were significantly reduced in the three-quarters sitting, supine, side-lying, and head-down positions. Oxygenation and reflux scores were worst in the head-down position. Despite statistical significance, the differences observed between positions in this stable population were of small magnitude. The effect of body position on MEP and PEFR may be more relevant during airway clearance treatments of the acutely unwell person with CF.
PY - 2005 SE - 2.267 SP - 385 EP - 391. [Impact Factor 2.267] ST - Pediatr. Pulmonol.Pediatr. Pulmonol. T2 - Pediatric Pulmonology TI - Effect of body position on maximal expiratory pressure and flow in adults with cystic fibrosis VL - 40 ER -