BACKGROUND: Approximately 15 million people who suffer a stroke globally each year are at risk of developing depression. AIM: To update our systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequency of depression after stroke published in 2005, including studies published before July 2004. METHODS: We included all published observational studies (to 31 May 2013) with prospective consecutive recruitment and quantification of the proportion of people with depression after stroke. We included studies of adult (>18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke, where an assessment of depression or depressive symptom burden was performed at a pre-specified time-point for all study participants. RESULTS: Data were available from 61 studies including 25,488 people. The proportional frequency of depression varied considerably across studies; however, the pooled frequency estimate of 31% (95% confidence interval 28% to 35%) was not significantly different from the 33% (difference of 2%, 95% confidence interval <1% to 3%) reported in the 2005 review. The proportion with depression between one and five-years (25%; 95% confidence interval 16 to 33%) and at five years after stroke (23%; 95% confidence interval 14 to 31%) was significantly lower. CONCLUSION: Despite systematic review evidence describing validated depression screening tools and effective treatment and prevention strategies for depression after stroke, there has not been a significant reduction in the proportion of people experiencing depression after stroke. There is a pressing need for increased clinical uptake of evidenced-based strategies to screen for, prevent, and treat depression after stroke.
AD - The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Reader in Epidemiology, The University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK. AN - 25117911 BT - International Journal of Stroke DP - NLM ET - 2014/08/15 LA - eng LB - NMH M1 - 8 N1 - Hackett, Maree LBACKGROUND: Approximately 15 million people who suffer a stroke globally each year are at risk of developing depression. AIM: To update our systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequency of depression after stroke published in 2005, including studies published before July 2004. METHODS: We included all published observational studies (to 31 May 2013) with prospective consecutive recruitment and quantification of the proportion of people with depression after stroke. We included studies of adult (>18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of stroke, where an assessment of depression or depressive symptom burden was performed at a pre-specified time-point for all study participants. RESULTS: Data were available from 61 studies including 25,488 people. The proportional frequency of depression varied considerably across studies; however, the pooled frequency estimate of 31% (95% confidence interval 28% to 35%) was not significantly different from the 33% (difference of 2%, 95% confidence interval <1% to 3%) reported in the 2005 review. The proportion with depression between one and five-years (25%; 95% confidence interval 16 to 33%) and at five years after stroke (23%; 95% confidence interval 14 to 31%) was significantly lower. CONCLUSION: Despite systematic review evidence describing validated depression screening tools and effective treatment and prevention strategies for depression after stroke, there has not been a significant reduction in the proportion of people experiencing depression after stroke. There is a pressing need for increased clinical uptake of evidenced-based strategies to screen for, prevent, and treat depression after stroke.
PY - 2014 SN - 1747-4949 (Electronic)