TY - JOUR AU - Haines T. AU - Brauer S. AU - Lindley R. AU - Zavarsek S. AU - Wolfe R. AU - Botti M. AU - Livingston P. AU - Kamar J. AU - Cumming R. AU - Hill K. AU - Brand C. AU - Barker A. AU - Sherrington C. AU - Morello R. AB -

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the 6-PACK programme on falls and fall injuries in acute wards. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to 24 acute wards during the trial period. INTERVENTIONS: Participating wards were randomly assigned to receive either the nurse led 6-PACK programme or usual care over 12 months. The 6-PACK programme included a fall risk tool and individualised use of one or more of six interventions: "falls alert" sign, supervision of patients in the bathroom, ensuring patients' walking aids are within reach, a toileting regimen, use of a low-low bed, and use of a bed/chair alarm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries per 1000 occupied bed days. RESULTS: During the trial, 46 245 admissions to 16 medical and eight surgical wards occurred. As many people were admitted more than once, this represented 31 411 individual patients. Patients' characteristics and length of stay were similar for intervention and control wards. Use of 6-PACK programme components was higher on intervention wards than on control wards (incidence rate ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.14 to 4.34; P<0.001). In all, 1831 falls and 613 fall injuries occurred, and the rates of falls (incidence rate ratio 1.04, 0.78 to 1.37; P=0.796) and fall injuries (0.96, 0.72 to 1.27; P=0.766) were similar in intervention and control wards. CONCLUSIONS: Positive changes in falls prevention practice occurred following the introduction of the 6-PACK programme. However, no difference was seen in falls or fall injuries between groups. High quality evidence showing the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in acute wards remains absent. Novel solutions to the problem of in-hospital falls are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000332921.

AD - Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia anna.barker@monash.edu.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Physiotherapy Department, Monash University, Allied Health Research Unit, Monash Health, Kingston Centre, Cheltenham, VIC 3195, Australia.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Northern Hospital, Northern Health, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia. AN - 26813674 BT - BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) C2 - PMC4727091 DA - 93562401117 DP - NLM ET - 2016/01/28 LA - eng LB - AUS
MSK
PROF
FY16 N1 - Barker, Anna L
Morello, Renata T
Wolfe, Rory
Brand, Caroline A
Haines, Terry P
Hill, Keith D
Brauer, Sandra G
Botti, Mari
Cumming, Robert G
Livingston, Patricia M
Sherrington, Catherine
Zavarsek, Silva
Lindley, Richard I
Kamar, Jeannette
England
BMJ. 2016 Jan 26;352:h6781. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6781. N2 -

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the 6-PACK programme on falls and fall injuries in acute wards. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted to 24 acute wards during the trial period. INTERVENTIONS: Participating wards were randomly assigned to receive either the nurse led 6-PACK programme or usual care over 12 months. The 6-PACK programme included a fall risk tool and individualised use of one or more of six interventions: "falls alert" sign, supervision of patients in the bathroom, ensuring patients' walking aids are within reach, a toileting regimen, use of a low-low bed, and use of a bed/chair alarm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were falls and fall injuries per 1000 occupied bed days. RESULTS: During the trial, 46 245 admissions to 16 medical and eight surgical wards occurred. As many people were admitted more than once, this represented 31 411 individual patients. Patients' characteristics and length of stay were similar for intervention and control wards. Use of 6-PACK programme components was higher on intervention wards than on control wards (incidence rate ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.14 to 4.34; P<0.001). In all, 1831 falls and 613 fall injuries occurred, and the rates of falls (incidence rate ratio 1.04, 0.78 to 1.37; P=0.796) and fall injuries (0.96, 0.72 to 1.27; P=0.766) were similar in intervention and control wards. CONCLUSIONS: Positive changes in falls prevention practice occurred following the introduction of the 6-PACK programme. However, no difference was seen in falls or fall injuries between groups. High quality evidence showing the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in acute wards remains absent. Novel solutions to the problem of in-hospital falls are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12611000332921.

PY - 2016 SN - 1756-1833 (Electronic)
0959-535X (Linking) EP - h6781 T2 - BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) TI - 6-PACK programme to decrease fall injuries in acute hospitals: cluster randomised controlled trial VL - 352 Y2 - FY16 ER -