TY - JOUR AU - Tunstall-Pedoe H. AU - Fox K. AU - Woodward Mark AU - Ford I. AU - Lewsey J. AU - Lawson K. AU - Ritchie L. AU - Watt G. AU - Kent S. AU - Neilson M. AU - Briggs A. AB -

OBJECTIVES: This is the second of the two papers introducing a cardiovascular disease (CVD) policy model. The first paper described the structure and statistical underpinning of the state-transition model, demonstrating how life expectancy estimates are generated for individuals defined by ASSIGN risk factors. This second paper describes how the model is prepared to undertake economic evaluation. DESIGN: To generate quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), the Scottish Health Survey was used to estimate background morbidity (health utilities) and the impact of CVD events (utility decrements). The SF-6D algorithm generated utilities and decrements were modelled using ordinary least squares (OLS). To generate lifetime hospital costs, the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) was linked to the Scottish morbidity and death records (SMR) to cost each continuous inpatient stay (CIS). OLS and restricted cubic splines estimated annual costs before and after each of the first four events. A Kaplan-Meier sample average (KMSA) estimator was then used to weight expected health-related quality of life and costs by the probability of survival. RESULTS: The policy model predicts the change in QALE and lifetime hospital costs as a result of an intervention(s) modifying risk factors. Cost-effectiveness analysis and a full uncertainty analysis can be undertaken, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Notably, the impacts according to socioeconomic deprivation status can be made. CONCLUSIONS: The policy model can conduct cost-effectiveness analysis and decision analysis to inform approaches to primary prevention, including individually targeted and population interventions, and to assess impacts on health inequalities.

AD - Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment , Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK.
Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK.
BHF Centre for Research Excellence, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK.
Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK.
Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee , Dundee , UK.
General Practice & Primary Care , Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK.
The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. AN - 27335653 BT - Open Heart C2 - PMC4908904 DP - NLM ET - 2016/06/24 LA - eng LB - AUS
UK
PROF
FY16 M1 - 1 N1 - Lawson, K D
Lewsey, J D
Ford, I
Fox, K
Ritchie, L D
Tunstall-Pedoe, H
Watt, G C M
Woodward, M
Kent, S
Neilson, M
Briggs, A H
England
Open Heart. 2016 Jun 10;3(1):e000140. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000140. eCollection 2016. N2 -

OBJECTIVES: This is the second of the two papers introducing a cardiovascular disease (CVD) policy model. The first paper described the structure and statistical underpinning of the state-transition model, demonstrating how life expectancy estimates are generated for individuals defined by ASSIGN risk factors. This second paper describes how the model is prepared to undertake economic evaluation. DESIGN: To generate quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), the Scottish Health Survey was used to estimate background morbidity (health utilities) and the impact of CVD events (utility decrements). The SF-6D algorithm generated utilities and decrements were modelled using ordinary least squares (OLS). To generate lifetime hospital costs, the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) was linked to the Scottish morbidity and death records (SMR) to cost each continuous inpatient stay (CIS). OLS and restricted cubic splines estimated annual costs before and after each of the first four events. A Kaplan-Meier sample average (KMSA) estimator was then used to weight expected health-related quality of life and costs by the probability of survival. RESULTS: The policy model predicts the change in QALE and lifetime hospital costs as a result of an intervention(s) modifying risk factors. Cost-effectiveness analysis and a full uncertainty analysis can be undertaken, including probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Notably, the impacts according to socioeconomic deprivation status can be made. CONCLUSIONS: The policy model can conduct cost-effectiveness analysis and decision analysis to inform approaches to primary prevention, including individually targeted and population interventions, and to assess impacts on health inequalities.

PY - 2016 SN - 2053-3624 (Electronic)
2053-3624 (Linking) EP - e000140 T2 - Open Heart TI - A cardiovascular disease policy model: part 2-preparing for economic evaluation and to assess health inequalities VL - 3 Y2 - FY16 ER -