BACKGROUND: Telehealth has emerged as a potential alternative to deliver interventions for low back pain (LBP), however its effectiveness has not been investigated.
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate whether interventions delivered by telehealth improve pain, disability, function, and quality of life in non-specific LBP.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis METHODS: Seven databases were searched from the earliest records to August 2015. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions, solo or in combination with other interventions, for non-specific LBP compared to a control group. Trials deemed clinically homogeneous were grouped in meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were included (N = 2280). In chronic LBP, telehealth interventions had no significant effect on pain at short [four trials; 1,089 participants; weighted mean difference (WMD) -2.61 points; 95% CI: -5.23 to 0.01] or medium-term follow-up (two trials; 441 participants; WMD: -0.94 points; 95% CI: -6.71 to 4.84) compared to a control group. Similarly, there was no significant effect for disability. Results from three individual trials showed that telehealth was superior to a control intervention for improving quality of life. Interventions combining telehealth and usual care were more beneficial than usual care alone in people with recent onset of LBP symptoms.
CONCLUSION: There is moderate-quality evidence that current telehealth interventions, alone, are not more effective than minimal interventions for reducing pain and disability in chronic LBP. To date, modern telehealth media (e.g. apps) and telehealth as an adjunct to usual care remain understudied.
BT - Spine J C1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28412562?dopt=Abstract DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.008 J2 - Spine J LA - eng N2 -BACKGROUND: Telehealth has emerged as a potential alternative to deliver interventions for low back pain (LBP), however its effectiveness has not been investigated.
PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to evaluate whether interventions delivered by telehealth improve pain, disability, function, and quality of life in non-specific LBP.
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis METHODS: Seven databases were searched from the earliest records to August 2015. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that investigated the effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions, solo or in combination with other interventions, for non-specific LBP compared to a control group. Trials deemed clinically homogeneous were grouped in meta-analyses.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were included (N = 2280). In chronic LBP, telehealth interventions had no significant effect on pain at short [four trials; 1,089 participants; weighted mean difference (WMD) -2.61 points; 95% CI: -5.23 to 0.01] or medium-term follow-up (two trials; 441 participants; WMD: -0.94 points; 95% CI: -6.71 to 4.84) compared to a control group. Similarly, there was no significant effect for disability. Results from three individual trials showed that telehealth was superior to a control intervention for improving quality of life. Interventions combining telehealth and usual care were more beneficial than usual care alone in people with recent onset of LBP symptoms.
CONCLUSION: There is moderate-quality evidence that current telehealth interventions, alone, are not more effective than minimal interventions for reducing pain and disability in chronic LBP. To date, modern telehealth media (e.g. apps) and telehealth as an adjunct to usual care remain understudied.
PY - 2017 T2 - Spine J TI - Effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions in the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. SN - 1878-1632 ER -