TY - JOUR KW - Humans KW - Research Design KW - Exercise Therapy KW - Delphi Technique KW - Surveys and Questionnaires KW - Checklist KW - Clinical Trials as Topic KW - Consensus AU - Maher Chris AU - Slade Susan AU - Dionne Clermont AU - Underwood Martin AU - Buchbinder Rachelle AU - Beck Belinda AU - Bennell Kim AU - Brosseau Lucie AU - Costa Leonardo AU - Cramp Fiona AU - Cup Edith AU - Feehan Lynne AU - Ferreira Manuela AU - Forbes Scott AU - Glasziou Paul AU - Habets Bas AU - Harris Susan AU - Hay-Smith Jean AU - Hillier Susan AU - Hinman Rana AU - Holland Ann AU - Hondras Maria AU - Kelly George AU - Kent Peter AU - Lauret Gert-Jan AU - Long Audrey AU - Morso Lars AU - Osteras Nina AU - Peterson Tom AU - Quinlivan Ros AU - Rees Karen AU - Regnaux Jean-Philippe AU - Rietberg Marc AU - Saunders Dave AU - Skoetz Nicole AU - Sogaard Karen AU - Takken Tim AU - van Tulder Maurits AU - Voet Nicoline AU - Ward Lesley AU - White Claire AB -
BACKGROUND: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a standardized method for reporting exercise programs in clinical trials: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).
DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the EQUATOR Network's methodological framework, 137 exercise experts were invited to participate in a Delphi consensus study. A list of 41 items was identified from a meta-epidemiologic study of 73 systematic reviews of exercise. For each item, participants indicated agreement on an 11-point rating scale. Consensus for item inclusion was defined a priori as greater than 70% agreement of respondents rating an item 7 or above. Three sequential rounds of anonymous online questionnaires and a Delphi workshop were used.
RESULTS: There were 57 (response rate=42%), 54 (response rate=95%), and 49 (response rate=91%) respondents to rounds 1 through 3, respectively, from 11 countries and a range of disciplines. In round 1, 2 items were excluded; 24 items reached consensus for inclusion (8 items accepted in original format), and 16 items were revised in response to participant suggestions. Of 14 items in round 2, 3 were excluded, 11 reached consensus for inclusion (4 items accepted in original format), and 7 were reworded. Sixteen items were included in round 3, and all items reached greater than 70% consensus for inclusion.
LIMITATIONS: The views of included Delphi panelists may differ from those of experts who declined participation and may not fully represent the views of all exercise experts.
CONCLUSIONS: The CERT, a 16-item checklist developed by an international panel of exercise experts, is designed to improve the reporting of exercise programs in all evaluative study designs and contains 7 categories: materials, provider, delivery, location, dosage, tailoring, and compliance. The CERT will encourage transparency, improve trial interpretation and replication, and facilitate implementation of effective exercise interventions into practice.
BT - Phys Ther C1 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27149962?dopt=Abstract DO - 10.2522/ptj.20150668 IS - 10 J2 - Phys Ther LA - eng N2 -BACKGROUND: Exercise interventions are often incompletely described in reports of clinical trials, hampering evaluation of results and replication and implementation into practice.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a standardized method for reporting exercise programs in clinical trials: the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).
DESIGN AND METHODS: Using the EQUATOR Network's methodological framework, 137 exercise experts were invited to participate in a Delphi consensus study. A list of 41 items was identified from a meta-epidemiologic study of 73 systematic reviews of exercise. For each item, participants indicated agreement on an 11-point rating scale. Consensus for item inclusion was defined a priori as greater than 70% agreement of respondents rating an item 7 or above. Three sequential rounds of anonymous online questionnaires and a Delphi workshop were used.
RESULTS: There were 57 (response rate=42%), 54 (response rate=95%), and 49 (response rate=91%) respondents to rounds 1 through 3, respectively, from 11 countries and a range of disciplines. In round 1, 2 items were excluded; 24 items reached consensus for inclusion (8 items accepted in original format), and 16 items were revised in response to participant suggestions. Of 14 items in round 2, 3 were excluded, 11 reached consensus for inclusion (4 items accepted in original format), and 7 were reworded. Sixteen items were included in round 3, and all items reached greater than 70% consensus for inclusion.
LIMITATIONS: The views of included Delphi panelists may differ from those of experts who declined participation and may not fully represent the views of all exercise experts.
CONCLUSIONS: The CERT, a 16-item checklist developed by an international panel of exercise experts, is designed to improve the reporting of exercise programs in all evaluative study designs and contains 7 categories: materials, provider, delivery, location, dosage, tailoring, and compliance. The CERT will encourage transparency, improve trial interpretation and replication, and facilitate implementation of effective exercise interventions into practice.
PY - 2016 SP - 1514 EP - 1524 T2 - Phys Ther TI - Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT): Modified Delphi Study. VL - 96 SN - 1538-6724 ER -