TY - JOUR AU - Grobbee Diederick AU - Bots Michiel AU - Wang Xin AU - Dalmeijer Geertje AU - Ruijter Hester AU - Anderson Todd AU - Britton Annie AU - Dekker Jacqueline AU - Engström Gunnar AU - Evans Greg AU - de Graaf Jacqueline AU - Hedblad Bo AU - Holewijn Suzanne AU - Ikeda Ai AU - Kauhanen Jussi AU - Kitagawa Kazuo AU - Kitamura Akihiko AU - Kurl Sudhir AU - Lonn Eva AU - Lorenz Matthias AU - Mathiesen Ellisiv AU - Nijpels Giel AU - Okazaki Shuhei AU - Polak Joseph AU - Price Jacqueline AU - Rembold Christopher AU - Rosvall Maria AU - Rundek Tatjana AU - Salonen Jukka AU - Sitzer Matthias AU - Stehouwer Coen AU - Tuomainen Tomi-Pekka AU - Peters Sanne AB -
BACKGROUND: The relation of a single risk factor with atherosclerosis is established. Clinically we know of risk factor clustering within individuals. Yet, studies into the magnitude of the relation of risk factor clusters with atherosclerosis are limited. Here, we assessed that relation.
METHODS: Individual participant data from 14 cohorts, involving 59,025 individuals were used in this cross-sectional analysis. We made 15 clusters of four risk factors (current smoking, overweight, elevated blood pressure, elevated total cholesterol). Multilevel age and sex adjusted linear regression models were applied to estimate mean differences in common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) between clusters using those without any of the four risk factors as reference group.
RESULTS: Compared to the reference, those with 1, 2, 3 or 4 risk factors had a significantly higher common CIMT: mean difference of 0.026 mm, 0.052 mm, 0.074 mm and 0.114 mm, respectively. These findings were the same in men and in women, and across ethnic groups. Within each risk factor cluster (1, 2, 3 risk factors), groups with elevated blood pressure had the largest CIMT and those with elevated cholesterol the lowest CIMT, a pattern similar for men and women.
CONCLUSION: Clusters of risk factors relate to increased common CIMT in a graded manner, similar in men, women and across race-ethnic groups. Some clusters seemed more atherogenic than others. Our findings support the notion that cardiovascular prevention should focus on sets of risk factors rather than individual levels alone, but may prioritize within clusters.
BT - PLoS One DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0173393 IS - 3 J2 - PLoS ONE LA - eng N2 -BACKGROUND: The relation of a single risk factor with atherosclerosis is established. Clinically we know of risk factor clustering within individuals. Yet, studies into the magnitude of the relation of risk factor clusters with atherosclerosis are limited. Here, we assessed that relation.
METHODS: Individual participant data from 14 cohorts, involving 59,025 individuals were used in this cross-sectional analysis. We made 15 clusters of four risk factors (current smoking, overweight, elevated blood pressure, elevated total cholesterol). Multilevel age and sex adjusted linear regression models were applied to estimate mean differences in common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) between clusters using those without any of the four risk factors as reference group.
RESULTS: Compared to the reference, those with 1, 2, 3 or 4 risk factors had a significantly higher common CIMT: mean difference of 0.026 mm, 0.052 mm, 0.074 mm and 0.114 mm, respectively. These findings were the same in men and in women, and across ethnic groups. Within each risk factor cluster (1, 2, 3 risk factors), groups with elevated blood pressure had the largest CIMT and those with elevated cholesterol the lowest CIMT, a pattern similar for men and women.
CONCLUSION: Clusters of risk factors relate to increased common CIMT in a graded manner, similar in men, women and across race-ethnic groups. Some clusters seemed more atherogenic than others. Our findings support the notion that cardiovascular prevention should focus on sets of risk factors rather than individual levels alone, but may prioritize within clusters.
PY - 2017 EP - e0173393 T2 - PLoS One TI - Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness: The USE-IMT study. VL - 12 SN - 1932-6203 ER -