TY - JOUR AU - Mensah George AU - Sampson Uchechukwu AU - Ezzati Majid AU - Engelgau Michael AU - Narayan K AU - Salicrup Luis AU - Belis Deshiree AU - Aron Laudan AU - Beaglehole Robert AU - Beaudet Alain AU - Briss Peter AU - Chambers David AU - Devaux Marion AU - Fiscella Kevin AU - Gottlieb Michael AU - Hakkinen Unto AU - Henderson Rain AU - Hennis Anselm AU - Hochman Judith AU - Koroshetz Walter AU - Mackenbach Johan AU - Marmot M AU - Martikainen Pekka AU - McClellan Mark AU - Meyers David AU - Parsons Polly AU - Rehnberg Clas AU - Sanghavi Darshak AU - Sidney Stephen AU - Siega-Riz Anna AU - Straus Sharon AU - Woolf Steven AU - Constant Stephanie AU - Creazzo Tony AU - de Jesus Janet AU - Gavini Nara AU - Lerner Norma AU - Mishoe Helena AU - Nelson Cheryl AU - Peprah Emmanuel AU - Punturieri Antonello AU - Tracy Rachael AU - Jan Stephen AB -
Four decades ago, U.S. life expectancy was within the same range as other high-income peer countries. However, during the past decades, the United States has fared worse in many key health domains resulting in shorter life expectancy and poorer health-a health disadvantage. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a panel of national and international health experts and stakeholders for a Think Tank meeting to explore the U.S. health disadvantage and to seek specific recommendations for implementation research opportunities for heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders. Recommendations for National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consideration were made in several areas including understanding the drivers of the disadvantage, identifying potential solutions, creating strategic partnerships with common goals, and finally enhancing and fostering a research workforce for implementation research. Key recommendations included exploring why the United States is doing better for health indicators in a few areas compared with peer countries; targeting populations across the entire socioeconomic spectrum with interventions at all levels in order to prevent missing a substantial proportion of the disadvantage; assuring partnership have high-level goals that can create systemic change through collective impact; and finally, increasing opportunities for implementation research training to meet the current needs. Connecting with the research community at large and building on ongoing research efforts will be an important strategy. Broad partnerships and collaboration across the social, political, economic, and private sectors and all civil society will be critical-not only for implementation research but also for implementing the findings to have the desired population impact. Developing the relevant knowledge to tackle the U.S. health disadvantage is the necessary first step to improve U.S. health outcomes.
BT - Glob Heart C1 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716847?dopt=Abstract DO - 10.1016/j.gheart.2018.03.003 J2 - Glob Heart LA - eng N2 -Four decades ago, U.S. life expectancy was within the same range as other high-income peer countries. However, during the past decades, the United States has fared worse in many key health domains resulting in shorter life expectancy and poorer health-a health disadvantage. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a panel of national and international health experts and stakeholders for a Think Tank meeting to explore the U.S. health disadvantage and to seek specific recommendations for implementation research opportunities for heart, lung, blood, and sleep disorders. Recommendations for National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consideration were made in several areas including understanding the drivers of the disadvantage, identifying potential solutions, creating strategic partnerships with common goals, and finally enhancing and fostering a research workforce for implementation research. Key recommendations included exploring why the United States is doing better for health indicators in a few areas compared with peer countries; targeting populations across the entire socioeconomic spectrum with interventions at all levels in order to prevent missing a substantial proportion of the disadvantage; assuring partnership have high-level goals that can create systemic change through collective impact; and finally, increasing opportunities for implementation research training to meet the current needs. Connecting with the research community at large and building on ongoing research efforts will be an important strategy. Broad partnerships and collaboration across the social, political, economic, and private sectors and all civil society will be critical-not only for implementation research but also for implementing the findings to have the desired population impact. Developing the relevant knowledge to tackle the U.S. health disadvantage is the necessary first step to improve U.S. health outcomes.
PY - 2018 T2 - Glob Heart TI - Implementation Research to Address the United States Health Disadvantage: Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop. SN - 2211-8179 ER -