Dr Christopher Butler appointed Programme Director of Multiple Long-Term Conditions

Media release

We are delighted to announce that Dr Christopher Butler has been appointed as Clinical Reader in Chronic and Complex Diseases and Program Director, Multiple Long-Term Conditions at The George Institute for Global Health, UK, and the School of Public Health and Department of Brain Sciences at Imperial College London.

Event

Moving together to build a healthier world: advancing the social participation for health agenda at the World Health Assembly in 2024

World health assembly 2024

As the world marches out of the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic towards Agenda 2030 and the goal of ‘leaving no one behind,’ the old dictum of ‘nothing about us without us’ is particularly salient. The pandemic has highlighted the need for participatory governance in health to foster inclusive and equitable health systems that are trusted by communities. Social Participation for Health (SPH), relates to empowerment of people, communities, and civil society to participate in and thereby influence decision-making processes for health, has demonstrated gains and impacts in health reform processes, though there is room to build our collective understanding of it, given its varying contexts and forms.

The WHO Executive Board (EB) met from 22-27 January 2024 to set the normative agenda for the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA). At the same time, under the leadership of Slovenia and Thailand, Member States are pursuing a resolution
on ‘social participation for  universal health coverage, health and well-being’ that will be adopted at WHA. Now is the time for civil society to hold our leaders accountable for their promises..

The briefing will convene experts in public health and community empowerment for an exchange of best practices and learnings from SPH efforts-to-date, with a view to developing action-oriented recommendations and consensus for collective action ahead of the proposed WHA resolution. It will underscore the importance and relevance of SPH while also informing the public, communities, and civil society on opportunities to influence ongoing negotiations on the resolution, and how to get involved and support it this year and beyond.

Date: Thursday 1st February 2024

Time:  07:00-08:30 EST/ 12:00-13:30 GMT/ 13:00-14:30 CET/ 17:30-19:00 IST

Format: Online

According to the 2023 Global Monitoring Report published by the WHO and the World Bank, more than 4.5 billion people lack access to essential health services and 2 billion face financial hardship when accessing them. These aren’t just numbers; they represent the daily struggle of billions of people around the world who are denied the right to health, well-being, and dignity. This distressing state, which spans all regions and most countries, underscores the urgent need for inclusive and equitable health systems that leave no one behind. This requires the involvement of all stakeholders including civil society and communities in decision making.

At the United Nations High-level Meeting on UHC in September 2023 world leaders renewed their commitment to accelerate progress towards achieving UHC and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. In the political declaration, world leaders committed advancing social participation “involving all relevant stakeholders, including local communities, health workers and care workers in the health sector, volunteers, civil society organisations and youth in the design, implementation and review of universal health coverage, to systematically inform decisions that affect public health, so that policies, programmes and plans better respond to individual and community health needs, while fostering trust in health systems.”

Event objectives:

  • Mobilise civil society to build political support for a WHA resolution on social participation in the decision-making process for health in countries.
  • Share updates on the WHO Executive Board and opportunities for civil society to get involved in the lead-up to the WHA.
  • Inform civil society about global and country-specific experiences regarding social participation in decision-making related to health, including the scientific evidence, and discuss recommendations for further advancing both. 

Agenda:

(all times are displayed in CET)

13:00-13:10 Welcome and introductions – Devaki Nambiar

13:15:13:40 What we know about Social Participation for Health(SPH)

  • Country experiences of SPH
  • An update on the scientific evidence on SPH

13:40-13:50 Q&A/discussion

13:50-14:10 Civil society priorities towards institutionalising social participation in 2024 and beyond - Lara Brearley and Laura Philidor

14:10-14:25 Q&A/discussion

14:25-14:30 Summary and closing remarks – Devaki Nambiar  

Confirmed speakers:

  • Dr Belgacem Sabri, Director of the Tunisian Association for Defense of the Right to Health
  • Devaki Nambiar, Program Director, Healthier Societies Strategy at the George Institute for Global Health India
  • Laura Philidor, Policy Advocacy and Communications Officer, Civil Society Engagement Mechanism for UHC2030 and WACI Health
  • Lara Brearley, Consultant, World Health Organization (WHO)
  • Nanoot Mathurapote, Head of Global Collaboration Unit, National Health Commission Office, Thailand
e-cigarettes-1335418639-NHMRC

Submission to Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) Call for Evidence on Youth Vaping – June 2023

The George Institute for Global Health is pleased to contribute a written submission to the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) inquiry into e-cigarette use among youth. OHID is part of the UK Government Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC).

We commend the UK Government for its efforts to address the health-related risks presented by the emergence and rapid market penetration of e-cigarettes. Although the long-term effects of using e-cigarettes or being exposed to them are yet unknown, there is mounting evidence that they are associated with increased risk of developing non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular diseases, lung disorders, and cancer. Over recent years, the use of unregulated vaping products (which are largely imported illegally) has rapidly increased with worrying trends in use seen among children and adolescents. These products contain chemicals that are harmful to health, usually including the addictive substance, nicotine. It is therefore critical that these products are regulated, and their availability strictly controlled.

Based on our evidence, we have identified several recommendations that we encourage the OHID to consider building regulatory compliance, reduce the appeal of vapes to children and address the marketing and promotion of vape productions:

  1. The influence of significant others, particularly friends and family, on use of e-cigarettes by young people is an important driver. E-cigarettes are being readily accessed from numerous sources, highlighting the importance of intensifying monitoring and enforcement of strict regulations to reduce e-cigarette supply. School settings offer an opportunity to reach young people in large numbers and potentially prevent the detrimental effects vaping has on mental health, peer relationships, and academic achievement.
  2. It is critical for young people to receive regular and reliable information about the harms associated with vaping. Different forms of messaging about harms need to be tested to ensure effectiveness and then disseminated widely through credible sources and well-designed public health campaigns to prevent misinformation from luring young people into vaping. 
  3. Since it appears to be the main means by which e-cigarette can reach young people, cigarette advertising at vape shops and other retailers should be limited, and advertising on social media should be banned. To avoid health-related harm, advertising regulations must be carefully constructed and strictly enforced. 

Read the full submission to learn more. You can also access the call for evidence outcome, and analysis of all 441 submissions received.

healthcare research

Submission on the 14th WHO General Programme of Work (GPW14), 2025-2028, November 2023

In October, The George Institute for Global Health participated in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) civil society consultation on its 14th General Programme of Work (GPW 14) that is being developed through a consultative process with partners and member states (MS) ahead of its adoption at the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2024. The GPW is a medium-term strategy agreed by MS to set a broad health agenda for that period and so defines the direction of work for WHO (including the planning, monitoring, and evaluation of this programme), with the goal to promote, provide, and protect health.

The George Institute submitted comments on the draft GPW 14 consultation paper, which includes several strategic objectives and draft outcomes that we are engaged with and where we have considerable expertise.

We welcome the proposed strategic objectives under the GPW 14, and there are several priority areas we strongly support, including the renewed focus on improving the monitoring and evaluation of results, as well as the emphasis on preventing and treating non-communicable diseases (NCDs), addressing the issue of catastrophic out-of-pocket expenses for health, and the aspiration for transformative action at the intersection of climate change and health.

To strengthen the GPW14, we recommend the following:

  • We urge the WHO to enhance capabilities in research and innovation and prioritise research and building the evidence as a central objective of every goal of GPW14
  • We fully support the emphasis on prioritising health and well-being in policy agendas, but we believe that a stronger emphasis should be placed on involving communities in the development, implementation and evaluation of these agendas
  • We recommend a more ambitious focus on achieving equity within the GPW14. This should involve clear articulation of how rights-based and equity-centred approaches will be integrated into the GPW’s implementation
  • We fully endorse the focus on addressing the issue of catastrophic out-of-pocket expenses for health and recommend setting a measurable target for investment in health to reduce out-of-pocket spending in alignment with national disease burdens
  • The Commercial Determinants of Health (CDoH) should be a fundamental component of WHO’s efforts to attain the second strategic objective of GPW14, which is focused on tackling the underlying causes of poor health.

Lean more about the GPW14.

Planetary health COP28

COP28: What was achieved for health?

From November 30 to December 12, the Twenty-eighth session of the Conference of the Parties (COP28) in Dubai brought together leaders from around the world to discuss how to limit global temperature rises and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The George Institute for Global Health was among 1,900 health representatives, and called for leaders to centre the voices of communities whose health, well-being and futures have been most impacted, ensuring they are at the heart of national climate action plans and debate.

The inaugural Health Day was a significant milestone, spotlighting the critical connection between climate change and human health, a topic neglected in the past 28 years of COPs. Alongside this event, various high-level gatherings, a two-week World Health Organization (WHO) Health Pavilion, and health installations underscored the urgency of addressing the climate crisis to protect human lives. The engagement of over 50 health ministers in the Climate-Health Ministerial and endorsements from 140+ countries for the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Declaration on Climate and Health showed promise. Many delegates related stories of significant impacts on health arising from the impacts of global warming. The Director General of the WHO, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, highlighted in several forums that more than 7 million people die every year due to air pollution from the burning of fossil fuels. It was noted that public health gains achieved in the 20th century are being reversed by climate change, with increased incidence of infectious diseases such as malaria and dengue fever of particular concern. While some delegates spoke about the interactions with non-communicable diseases and injuries (NCDIs), it was clear that more work needs to be done to highlight the implications of global heating in this area.

It’s imperative that the commitments made in the Declaration on Climate and Health are translated into action, ensuring sustained attention to Health Day in future COPs and mainstreaming health as pivotal for ambitious climate action in COP and other policy-making spaces, including the forthcoming World Health Assembly in 2024. Although the Declaration acknowledged the link between healthy populations and climate resilience across sectors like food, water, housing, and energy, overall COP28 outcomes fell short. Some high-income countries hesitated to recognise their primary responsibility in reducing emissions and failed to commit to financially support adaptation and mitigate loss and damage in the most impacted regions. One of the positive outcomes of Health Day was the collaborations that are emerging. For example, US $1 billion in funding was announced to kickstart implementation of the health declaration, with contributions from development banks, climate funds and large philanthropic organisations. The WHO in partnership with others has developed a set of financing principles for climate and health initiatives to help support implementation. While the funding is still small relative to the need, it indicates that there is an increasing understanding of the links between climate and health which can be built on in future. In addition, the Australian Government launched its first National Health and Climate Strategy, which highlights the importance of investing in research to improve the evidence base for responses to climate change. We hope to see this translate into funding for implementation.

Encouragingly, the UAE Declaration on Climate and Health emphasises the importance of strengthening health systems to anticipate and implement adaptation measures against climate-sensitive health risks (such as climate-health information services, surveillance, and early warning and response systems). However, we need a more robust emphasis on developing climate risk and vulnerability assessments for high-risk communities and leveraging digital platforms to generate high-quality data for decision-making. Strengthening primary health care services is also crucial, given their role as the primary point of access for many communities, and ability to provide essential mental health support—a critical response to the significant health impacts of the climate crisis.

COP28 celebrated key accomplishments, notably being termed the most 'Inclusive COP.' It introduced the People's Plenary, providing civil society with a formal platform to voice expectations. There were dedicated days focused on the experience of climate impacts by Indigenous peoples and women, and their respective roles in driving community-led climate action. The inclusion of diverse constituencies is a welcome development, but it was noted during discussions that there are still too few of these constituencies represented in the formal negotiations. The first Youth Stocktake offered a comprehensive analysis of youth involvement in climate diplomacy, serving as a blueprint for enhancing their participation in future COPs. Additionally, a $220 million funding package for Africa aimed at improving youth health and an upcoming dialogue in 2024 on the impacts of climate change on children and youth indicated progress in engaging communities in policymaking. These initiatives should set a precedent and be expanded to support other groups experiencing marginalisation, including Indigenous communities.

In contrast to previous conferences, COP28 also prioritised mostly plant-based catering and starting food emissions labelling on certain products, which is a positive development after concerns raised by Coca Cola’s sponsorship of COP27, also described as a “de-facto sponsor of the obesity epidemic causing diabetes and other NCDs”. Our innovative ecoSwitch app aims to support consumers in making healthy and more sustainable choices, using data on the greenhouse gas emissions associated with a product’s ingredients - a key driver of global heating– to assign a planetary health rating and suggest alternative products with a lower environmental impact. Yet notable increase in meat and dairy lobbyists, tripling compared to the previous year to a total of 340, alongside the continued substantial presence of at least 2,456 lobbyists from the fossil fuel industry, remains raises concerns about the potential for undue influence on the outcomes of COP.

The outcomes of the Global Stocktake rightly recognised the substantial contributions of various non-governmental stakeholders toward limiting global warming to 1.5°C. The George Institute in its new capacity as an Official Observer to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) looks forward to engaging even more substantively with the COP in future. Through our emerging Planetary Health Initiative, we will continue to enhance knowledge on and address knowledge gaps in adaptation and availability of information on climate change impacts, including for monitoring and progress –.

Further information:

  1. Read Veronica Le Nevez' insights on the COP28 Outcome's inaugural global stocktake, accessible here.
  2. Explore the latest Health Policy Watch article titled ‘From Australia to Bangladesh and Beyond: Mobilizing Local Communities Is Key to Breaking Down Climate and Health Silos’, authored by Chhavi Bhandari, Emma Feeny, and Kez Bennett Brook.
  3. Discover The George Institute's COP priorities, including our Conference delegation.
  4. Explore our Planetary Health Brochure, summarising our initiatives and dedication to advancing evidence-informed action to improve planetary health.

Meet Mei Ling Yap, Senior Research Fellow in Oncology and Head of the Cancer Program at The George Institute

In her role as a staff specialist radiation oncologist, A/Prof Mei Ling Yap has trained and worked in cancer care in many parts of the world including Singapore, Canada and Australia. Most recently her clinical practice has taken her to the Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres in vibrant South-Western Sydney.

Most read story 2022

The George Institute’s top 5 most read stories of 2023!

2023 has been another significant and pivotal year for The George Institute for Global Health. Our team has continued to deliver ground-breaking research across our strategic pillars of better care, better treatments and healthier societies. We’ve forged new research partnerships and welcomed new leadership across our offices.

As we look forward to new milestones and achievements in 2024, let's take a look at the stories that captured our readers' attention this year!

Are plant-based meats really better for us than the real thing?

Research led by Maria Shahid found that despite the growing popularity of plant-based meat substitutes, there is very little evidence of the actual health impact of these products.

The team concluded that until more is known about the health impacts of plant-based meat analogues and there are recommendations on how to include them as part of a healthy balanced diet, it's best to eat them in moderation.

Destination for Safety 2024 revealed as Delhi

We were excited to announce that Safety 2024 - the 15th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion - is to be held in Delhi, hosted by The George Institute India.

The theme for Safety 2024 - Emerging Challenges in Injury Prevention: transformation and resilience for a safer world - reflects these aims with a “co-design” and “co-benefit” agenda, encouraging researchers and practitioners to look beyond just injury or violence prevention to inclusive and broader actions which can affect health such as air quality and climate change.

Why is Mongolia the stroke capital of the world and what can be done?

Research in collaboration with the Institute of Medical Sciences in Mongolia found the burden of stroke in Mongolia affects a much younger population compared to high-income countries (HICs). Stroke in Mongolia occur at a mean age of 60 years, which is at least 10 years earlier than the average age in HICs.

Apart from highlighting the age disadvantage, the study also revealed that the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke, which is caused by bleeding into the brain from a ruptured blood vessel. In Mongolia, the incidence of haemorrhagic stroke is several-fold higher than anywhere elsewhere in the world.

New study shows common blood pressure meds under-used for migraine

The first known large-scale review of international studies on the positive effect of blood pressure (BP) medicines across all classes in preventing migraine showed that these common drugs could be used much more widely, at a lower cost, than is the case with current practice.

Results indicated that not all BP medications are equally effective in preventing migraine. The George Institute will soon publish a further review to give more insight into which of the various mechanisms are most effective.

Food industry failing to meet Government’s Health Star Rating targets

In November - a new report found that Australia’s food industry is failing to meet the already low targets for displaying Health Star Ratings (HSRs) on product packaging by a significant margin.

The 2023 State of the Food Supply Report also highlighted how the food industry is preferentially applying HSRs to healthier categories and avoiding showing star ratings on the packaging of low-rating, less healthy items. With HSRs still missing on more than half of all products, consumers are being denied the chance to use this information.