02097nas a2200205 4500000000100000008004100001100001500042700001100057700001500068700001600083700001700099700001400116700001500130700001500145245010500160250001500265300002100280520153900301020005101840 2017 d1 aMoseley G.1 aLee H.1 aMcAuley J.1 aWilliams C.1 aHübscher M.1 aKamper S.1 aTraeger A.1 aSkinner I.00aAn embedded randomised controlled trial of a Teaser Campaign to optimise recruitment in primary care a2017/01/10 a17407745166839213 a
BACKGROUND: Marketing communication and brand identity is a fundamental principle of advertising and end-user engagement. Health researchers have begun to apply this principle to trial recruitment in primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a Teaser Campaign using a series of postcards in advance of a conventional mail-out increases the number of primary care clinics that engage with a clinical trial. METHODS: Embedded randomised recruitment trial across primary care clinics (general practitioners and physiotherapists) in the Sydney metropolitan area. Clinics in the Teaser Campaign group received a series of branded promotional postcards in advance of a standard letter inviting them to participate in a clinical trial. Clinics in the Standard Mail group did not receive the postcards. RESULTS: From a total of 744 clinics that were sent an invitation letter, 46 clinics in the Teaser Campaign group and 40 clinics in the Standard Mail group responded (11.6% total response rate). There was no between-group difference in the odds of responding to the invitation letter (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.75-1.85, p = 0.49). For physiotherapy clinics and general practice clinics, the odds ratios were 1.43 (confidence interval = 0.82-2.48, p = 0.21) and 0.77 (confidence interval = 0.34-1.75, p = 0.54), respectively. CONCLUSION: A Teaser Campaign using a series of branded promotional postcards did not improve clinic engagement for a randomised controlled trial in primary care.
a1740-7753 (Electronic)