TY - JOUR AU - Ivers R. AU - Muscatello D. AU - Dinh M. AU - Bein K. AU - Chalkley D. AU - Paoloni R. AU - Rogers K. AU - Russell S. AU - Hayman J. AB -

BACKGROUND: Disposition decisions are critical to the functioning of Emergency Departments. The objectives of the present study were to derive and internally validate a prediction model for inpatient admission from the Emergency Department to assist with triage, patient flow and clinical decision making. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of State-wide Emergency Department data in New South Wales, Australia. Adult patients (age >/= 16 years) were included if they presented to a Level five or six (tertiary level) Emergency Department in New South Wales, Australia between 2013 and 2014. The outcome of interest was in-patient admission from the Emergency Department. This included all admissions to short stay and medical assessment units and being transferred out to another hospital. Analyses were performed using logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using area under curve and derived risk scores were plotted to assess calibration. RESULTS: 1,721,294 presentations from twenty three Level five or six hospitals were analysed. Of these 49.38% were male and the mean (sd) age was 49.85 years (22.13). Level 6 hospitals accounted for 47.70% of cases and 40.74% of cases were classified as an in-patient admission based on their mode of separation. The final multivariable model including age, arrival by ambulance, triage category, previous admission and presenting problem had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81, 0.82). CONCLUSION: By deriving and internally validating a risk score model to predict the need for in-patient admission based on basic demographic and triage characteristics, patient flow in ED, clinical decision making and overall quality of care may be improved. Further studies are now required to establish clinical effectiveness of this risk score model.

AD - Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. michael.dinh@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Discipline of Emergency Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. michael.dinh@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. michael.dinh@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Emergency Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Nursing, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Discipline of Emergency Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Health Education and Training Institute, New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. AN - 27912757 BT - BMC Emerg Med CN - [IF]: 0.000 DP - NLM ET - 2016/12/04 J2 - BMC emergency medicine LA - eng LB - AUS
INJ
OCS
FY17 M1 - 1 N1 - Dinh, Michael M
Russell, Saartje Berendsen
Bein, Kendall J
Rogers, Kris
Muscatello, David
Paoloni, Richard
Hayman, Jon
Chalkley, Dane R
Ivers, Rebecca
England
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):46. N2 -

BACKGROUND: Disposition decisions are critical to the functioning of Emergency Departments. The objectives of the present study were to derive and internally validate a prediction model for inpatient admission from the Emergency Department to assist with triage, patient flow and clinical decision making. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of State-wide Emergency Department data in New South Wales, Australia. Adult patients (age >/= 16 years) were included if they presented to a Level five or six (tertiary level) Emergency Department in New South Wales, Australia between 2013 and 2014. The outcome of interest was in-patient admission from the Emergency Department. This included all admissions to short stay and medical assessment units and being transferred out to another hospital. Analyses were performed using logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using area under curve and derived risk scores were plotted to assess calibration. RESULTS: 1,721,294 presentations from twenty three Level five or six hospitals were analysed. Of these 49.38% were male and the mean (sd) age was 49.85 years (22.13). Level 6 hospitals accounted for 47.70% of cases and 40.74% of cases were classified as an in-patient admission based on their mode of separation. The final multivariable model including age, arrival by ambulance, triage category, previous admission and presenting problem had an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81, 0.82). CONCLUSION: By deriving and internally validating a risk score model to predict the need for in-patient admission based on basic demographic and triage characteristics, patient flow in ED, clinical decision making and overall quality of care may be improved. Further studies are now required to establish clinical effectiveness of this risk score model.

PY - 2016 SN - 1471-227X (Electronic)
1471-227X (Linking) EP - 46 T2 - BMC Emerg Med TI - The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia VL - 16 Y2 - FY17 ER -