Multifaceted approach to managing cardiovascular risk proves too complex in practice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34028/340281a6d1c6c55442e541b8e04891bb079b41f2" alt="doc"
STRATEGIES for helping primary care physicians to assess the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in their patients have shown promise, but research published today in the Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) shows combining several tools in a complex intervention with several moving parts was not effective. The research, led by The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, and involving collaborators across Australia, set out to determine whether a multifaceted primary health care intervention helped control CVD risk factors in patients with high risk better than usual care.
Please refer to the media release from MJA on the right.
Stay connected and updated
Subscribe to our mailing list for the latest news, events, and updates in health research.
Lead
Related People
Prof Rohina Joshi
Senior Research Fellow
Baldeep Kaur
Senior Project Manager
Dr Shane Galgey
Project Manager & Medical Monitor
Professor Stephen Jan
Head of Health Economics and Process Evaluation Program
Qiang Li
Senior Biostatistician
Professor Anthony Rodgers
Professorial Fellow, Professoriate
Professor David Peiris
Chief Scientist
Professor Anushka Patel
Chief Executive Officer, The George Institute for Global Health